World neurosurgery · 2026
Do Surgical Setbacks Shape Surgical Judgment? Exploring the Psychological and Cognitive Effects of Complications on Neurosurgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study from Pakistan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khan Ceemal Fareed, Riaz Muhammad, Khan Saad, Ismail Aimen, Basit Abdul, Aziz Hafiza Fatima, Qamar Mohammad Adil, Alam Muhammad Mehboob, Malik Noor, Akhunzada Naveed Zaman
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery carries one of the highest complication-associated morbidity burdens of any surgical specialty. While patient-facing consequences of adverse events are well documented, the psychological, professional, and financial impact on the operating neurosurgeon, the "second victim," remains poorly characterized, limiting the development of evidence-based support frameworks.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychological and behavioral sequelae experienced by neurosurgeons following major surgical complications and to identify unmet institutional support needs.
METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was distributed to neurosurgeons across varied practice settings and career stages across Pakistan. Domains included complication exposure, emotional impact, confidence changes, decision-making modifications, morbidity and mortality conference participation, support received, financial consequences, medicolegal concern, and preferred support modalities. Descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: Eighty-one neurosurgeons participated. Major complications were reported by 96%; neurological deficit and postoperative infection were most common, 62% each. More than 63% rated emotional impact at 4 or 5 of 5, and 73% reported a postcomplication decline in surgical confidence. Fear or hesitation in managing similar cases affected 72%. 86% modified their decision-making through increased conservatism, defensive documentation, and greater second-opinion seeking yet 77.8% received no formal support. Financial consequences affected 27.2% and 75.3% perceived inadequate institutional financial protection.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications impose a substantial multidimensional burden on neurosurgeons, encompassing emotional distress, confidence erosion, and financial strain. The near-universal absence of formal support represents a critical institutional gap. Structured peer support, reflective debriefing, and financial protection mechanisms should be systematically integrated into neurosurgical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychological and behavioral sequelae experienced by neurosurgeons following major surgical complications and to identify unmet institutional support needs.
METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was distributed to neurosurgeons across varied practice settings and career stages across Pakistan. Domains included complication exposure, emotional impact, confidence changes, decision-making modifications, morbidity and mortality conference participation, support received, financial consequences, medicolegal concern, and preferred support modalities. Descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: Eighty-one neurosurgeons participated. Major complications were reported by 96%; neurological deficit and postoperative infection were most common, 62% each. More than 63% rated emotional impact at 4 or 5 of 5, and 73% reported a postcomplication decline in surgical confidence. Fear or hesitation in managing similar cases affected 72%. 86% modified their decision-making through increased conservatism, defensive documentation, and greater second-opinion seeking yet 77.8% received no formal support. Financial consequences affected 27.2% and 75.3% perceived inadequate institutional financial protection.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications impose a substantial multidimensional burden on neurosurgeons, encompassing emotional distress, confidence erosion, and financial strain. The near-universal absence of formal support represents a critical institutional gap. Structured peer support, reflective debriefing, and financial protection mechanisms should be systematically integrated into neurosurgical practice.