Frontiers in medicine · 2025
Comparing general and regional anesthesia in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of national health insurance data in Korea.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Seungyoung, Ahn Eunjin, Kim Min Kyoung, White Fletcher A, Chung Euiheon, Chung YongHun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of general and regional anesthesia on clinical outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: This retrospective study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Research Database included 1,522 patients who underwent THA under general anesthesia (n = 640) or regional anesthesia (n = 882) between 2002 and 2015. We compared the mortality and complication rates within 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Prosthesis failure (1.56% vs. 0.45%, p = 0.025), admission to the intensive care unit (9.53 vs. 5.44%, p = 0.0023), and total cost (₩7,332,515 vs. ₩6,833,295, p < 0.0001) were higher in the general anesthesia group than in the regional anesthesia group. No significant differences were observed in mortality (0.94% vs. 0.57%, p = 0.54), transfusion rate (81.1% vs. 80.9%, p = 0.94), length of hospital stay (45 vs. 45 days, p = 0.23), or other complications between the groups. Similar results were observed in propensity-score matched analysis (n = 640 patients per group).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that both anesthesia types resulted in comparable mortality and complication rates in patients who underwent THA, but the costs differed.
METHODS: This retrospective study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Research Database included 1,522 patients who underwent THA under general anesthesia (n = 640) or regional anesthesia (n = 882) between 2002 and 2015. We compared the mortality and complication rates within 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Prosthesis failure (1.56% vs. 0.45%, p = 0.025), admission to the intensive care unit (9.53 vs. 5.44%, p = 0.0023), and total cost (₩7,332,515 vs. ₩6,833,295, p < 0.0001) were higher in the general anesthesia group than in the regional anesthesia group. No significant differences were observed in mortality (0.94% vs. 0.57%, p = 0.54), transfusion rate (81.1% vs. 80.9%, p = 0.94), length of hospital stay (45 vs. 45 days, p = 0.23), or other complications between the groups. Similar results were observed in propensity-score matched analysis (n = 640 patients per group).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that both anesthesia types resulted in comparable mortality and complication rates in patients who underwent THA, but the costs differed.