Asian journal of psychiatry · 2017
Impaired frontal lobe functions in patients with Parkinson's disease and psychosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thota Naveen, Lenka Abhishek, George Lija, Hegde Shantala, Arumugham Shyam Sundar, Prasad Shweta, Stezin Albert, Kamble Nitish, Yadav Ravi, Pal Pramod Kumar
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may develop several non-motor symptoms (NMS). Psychosis is one of the debilitating NMS of PD. The neurobiology of psychosis is not fully understood. This study aims to compare the frontal lobe functions of PD patients with and without psychosis using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB).
METHODOLOGY: This study included 69 patients with PD; 34 with psychosis (PD-P) and 35 without psychosis (PD-NP). Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) was used to screen for cognitive impairment. Unified Parkinson's disease Rating scale part-III (UPDRS-III) was used to measure the severity and Hoehn and Yahr score (H&Y) was used to measure the stage of PD. Frontal lobe functions were assessed by FAB.
RESULTS: The PD-P and PD-NP groups were comparable for age (58.7±8.4 vs 55.7±8.2, p=0.14), age at onset of symptoms (51.4±8.1 vs 50.0±8.8, p=0.48), gender distribution (men: 88%vs 80%, p=0.51), MMSE (28.2±1.9 vs 28.7±1.2 p=0.12), levodopa equivalent dose/day (736.0±376.3 vs 625.2±332.2, p=0.19), UPDRS-III OFF-score (36.7±8.8 vs 35.4±13.2, p=0.64), UPDRS-III ON-score (13.2±5.4 vs 12.4±6.6, p=0.44) and H&Y stage (2.3±0.3 vs 2.3±0.3, p=0.07). PD-P group had lower total FAB score compared to PD-NP group (13.9±2.2 vs 16.5±1.8, p<0.01). On the FAB, PD-P group had lower scores compared to PD-NP in lexical fluency (FAB-2), programming (FAB-3), sensitivity to interference (FAB-4) and inhibitory control (FAB-5).
CONCLUSION: Patients with PD-P had significant frontal lobe dysfunction compared to PD-NP. FAB may be a simple and useful bedside tool to assess frontal dysfunction in patients with PD in a busy neurological set up.
METHODOLOGY: This study included 69 patients with PD; 34 with psychosis (PD-P) and 35 without psychosis (PD-NP). Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) was used to screen for cognitive impairment. Unified Parkinson's disease Rating scale part-III (UPDRS-III) was used to measure the severity and Hoehn and Yahr score (H&Y) was used to measure the stage of PD. Frontal lobe functions were assessed by FAB.
RESULTS: The PD-P and PD-NP groups were comparable for age (58.7±8.4 vs 55.7±8.2, p=0.14), age at onset of symptoms (51.4±8.1 vs 50.0±8.8, p=0.48), gender distribution (men: 88%vs 80%, p=0.51), MMSE (28.2±1.9 vs 28.7±1.2 p=0.12), levodopa equivalent dose/day (736.0±376.3 vs 625.2±332.2, p=0.19), UPDRS-III OFF-score (36.7±8.8 vs 35.4±13.2, p=0.64), UPDRS-III ON-score (13.2±5.4 vs 12.4±6.6, p=0.44) and H&Y stage (2.3±0.3 vs 2.3±0.3, p=0.07). PD-P group had lower total FAB score compared to PD-NP group (13.9±2.2 vs 16.5±1.8, p<0.01). On the FAB, PD-P group had lower scores compared to PD-NP in lexical fluency (FAB-2), programming (FAB-3), sensitivity to interference (FAB-4) and inhibitory control (FAB-5).
CONCLUSION: Patients with PD-P had significant frontal lobe dysfunction compared to PD-NP. FAB may be a simple and useful bedside tool to assess frontal dysfunction in patients with PD in a busy neurological set up.