Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2026
Association of Natural Disasters on Trends of County-Level Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Piccolini Andrea, Dagnino Filippo, Chen Yu-Jen, Qian Zhiyu, Lipsitz Stuart, Korn Stephan M, Xiao Boyuan, Pohl Klara, Zurl Hanna, Stelzl Daniel R, Stone Benjamin V, Lughezzani Giovanni, Buffi Nicolò M, Iyer Hari S, Trinh Quoc-Dien, Cole Alexander P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Natural disasters may worsen cancer outcomes through treatment delays, screening interruptions, or fragmented health care delivery. We investigated whether climate-related natural disasters were associated with changes in county-level prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.
METHODS: We modeled county-level screening estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2004 to 2012 using Census-derived demographic weights. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s Disaster Declarations Summaries database was used to include counties that experienced a single climate-related natural disaster. The year of disaster was considered the index date, with 2-year pre- and post-disaster periods used to model counterfactual screening prevalence with vs without a natural disaster. Primary outcome was county-level PSA screening prevalence. We applied log-linear regression to estimate prevalence ratios for the association between natural disaster and two-year county-level PSA screening.
RESULTS: In 37 states, 365 counties experienced a single natural disaster, including a total population of 7,584,059 men aged 40-79. Compared to baseline county-level screening prevalence, PSA screening in the 2-year post-disaster period was 8% lower (rate ratio [RR]:0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.94, P <0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed significantly lower county-level PSA screening prevalence following a climate-related natural disaster. These results underscore the potential impacts of climate-related natural disasters on cancer screening services.
METHODS: We modeled county-level screening estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2004 to 2012 using Census-derived demographic weights. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s Disaster Declarations Summaries database was used to include counties that experienced a single climate-related natural disaster. The year of disaster was considered the index date, with 2-year pre- and post-disaster periods used to model counterfactual screening prevalence with vs without a natural disaster. Primary outcome was county-level PSA screening prevalence. We applied log-linear regression to estimate prevalence ratios for the association between natural disaster and two-year county-level PSA screening.
RESULTS: In 37 states, 365 counties experienced a single natural disaster, including a total population of 7,584,059 men aged 40-79. Compared to baseline county-level screening prevalence, PSA screening in the 2-year post-disaster period was 8% lower (rate ratio [RR]:0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.94, P <0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed significantly lower county-level PSA screening prevalence following a climate-related natural disaster. These results underscore the potential impacts of climate-related natural disasters on cancer screening services.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemUnited StatesHumansMaleAdultMiddle AgedAgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerPrevalenceNatural DisastersLinear ModelsMass ScreeningNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited States Government AgenciesDatabases, Factual