The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2021
Anomalous Aortic Origin of Right Coronary Artery: Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bibevski Steve, Ruzmetov Mark, Turner Immanuel I, Scholl Frank G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Anomalous aortic origin of right coronary artery (AAORCA) is a congenital heart lesion that may be associated with coronary ischemia and sudden death; however, the management of these patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze all patients with AAORCA managed at our center.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with an isolated diagnosis of AAOCA were retrospectively reviewed, irrespective of symptoms, from 2007 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained by medical record review. AAORCA was diagnosed by echocardiogram and computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging studies in all patients. Treatment was based on anatomic, morphologic, and symptomatic features for patients older than 10 years with AAORCA.
RESULTS: The review identified 86 patients with a median age of 16 years; of these, 26 (30%) were managed surgically and 60 (70%) are monitored nonsurgically. Surgical intervention included a "classic" unroofing in 10 (39%), neo-ostial creation in 7 (27%), modified unroofing with neo-ostial creation in 6 (23%), a "classic" unroofing with reimplantation in 2 (7%), and reimplantation only in 1 (4%). Surgical patients were significantly older (P = .01), described more chest pain symptoms (P = .004), had the presence of slitlike ostia (P = .03), and longer length of coronary artery narrowing (P = .0002). At follow-up (median, 3 years; range, 0-13 years), 100% of surgical patients underwent functional testing and had no evidence of ischemia. Postoperative evaluation included one or more of echocardiography, computed tomographic angiogram, magnetic resonance imaging, and exercise stress test.
CONCLUSIONS: Our program uses a systematic approach for patients with AAORCA. With this paradigm, outcomes are excellent in the midterm, as validated with anatomic- and function-based testing.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with an isolated diagnosis of AAOCA were retrospectively reviewed, irrespective of symptoms, from 2007 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained by medical record review. AAORCA was diagnosed by echocardiogram and computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging studies in all patients. Treatment was based on anatomic, morphologic, and symptomatic features for patients older than 10 years with AAORCA.
RESULTS: The review identified 86 patients with a median age of 16 years; of these, 26 (30%) were managed surgically and 60 (70%) are monitored nonsurgically. Surgical intervention included a "classic" unroofing in 10 (39%), neo-ostial creation in 7 (27%), modified unroofing with neo-ostial creation in 6 (23%), a "classic" unroofing with reimplantation in 2 (7%), and reimplantation only in 1 (4%). Surgical patients were significantly older (P = .01), described more chest pain symptoms (P = .004), had the presence of slitlike ostia (P = .03), and longer length of coronary artery narrowing (P = .0002). At follow-up (median, 3 years; range, 0-13 years), 100% of surgical patients underwent functional testing and had no evidence of ischemia. Postoperative evaluation included one or more of echocardiography, computed tomographic angiogram, magnetic resonance imaging, and exercise stress test.
CONCLUSIONS: Our program uses a systematic approach for patients with AAORCA. With this paradigm, outcomes are excellent in the midterm, as validated with anatomic- and function-based testing.