Intensive & critical care nursing · 2012
Prevalence, management and clinical challenges associated with acute faecal incontinence in the ICU and critical care settings: the FIRST cross-sectional descriptive survey.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bayón García Cristina, Binks Rachel, De Luca Enrico, Dierkes Christine, Franci Andrea, Gallart Elisabet, Niederalt Georg, Wyncoll Duncan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, awareness and management of acute faecal incontinence with diarrhoea (AFId) in the Intensive Care Unit.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive survey design of intensive care units across Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom.
RESULTS: 962 questionnaires were completed by nurses (60%), physicians (29%) and pharmacists or purchasing personnel (11%). The estimated prevalence of AFId ranged from 9 to 37% of patients on the day of the survey. The majority of respondents reported a low-moderate awareness of the clinical challenges associated with AFId. Patients with AFId commonly had compromised skin integrity, which included perineal dermatitis, moisture lesions or sacral pressure ulcers. Reducing the risk of cross-infection and protecting skin integrity were rated as the most important clinical challenges. 49% had no hospital protocol or guideline for AFId management. There was also a low awareness of nursing time spent managing AFId; 60% of respondents estimated that 10-20 minutes are required for managing an AFId episode by 2-3 healthcare staff.
CONCLUSIONS: AFId in the critical care setting may be an underestimated problem which is associated with a high use of nursing time.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive survey design of intensive care units across Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom.
RESULTS: 962 questionnaires were completed by nurses (60%), physicians (29%) and pharmacists or purchasing personnel (11%). The estimated prevalence of AFId ranged from 9 to 37% of patients on the day of the survey. The majority of respondents reported a low-moderate awareness of the clinical challenges associated with AFId. Patients with AFId commonly had compromised skin integrity, which included perineal dermatitis, moisture lesions or sacral pressure ulcers. Reducing the risk of cross-infection and protecting skin integrity were rated as the most important clinical challenges. 49% had no hospital protocol or guideline for AFId management. There was also a low awareness of nursing time spent managing AFId; 60% of respondents estimated that 10-20 minutes are required for managing an AFId episode by 2-3 healthcare staff.
CONCLUSIONS: AFId in the critical care setting may be an underestimated problem which is associated with a high use of nursing time.