MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The American surgeon · 2010

Optimizing outcomes in emergency room thoracotomy: a 20-year experience in an urban Level I trauma center.

Gomez Gerardo, Fecher Alison, Joy Theresa, Pardo Ivanesa, Jacobson Lewis, Kemp Heather

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Emergency room thoracotomy (ERT) has remained a last resort tool of resuscitation in the management of patients with major trauma. The medical records of all patients undergoing ERT for penetrating chest trauma from January 1, 2000 through April 30, 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The data from this study were added to data collected in two previous studies conducted at our institution for meta-analysis. A total of 102 ERTs were performed. There were 28 Class I patients (27.4%), 58 Class II (56.8%), six Class III (5.8%), and 11 Class IV (10.7%). The number of ERTs performed on Class I patients has decreased from 58.3 per cent in the 1995 group to 35.4 per cent in the 1999 group. There was an overall survival of 7.8 per cent in the current period of review. Overall survival in the 1995 group was 2.5 per cent, 1999 was 2.7 per cent, and 2008 was 7.8 per cent. The majority of the survival benefit occurs in patients who have electrical activity and a blood pressure when examined in the emergency department (Class III and IV). We intend to do future prospective research to further clarify the Class II patients when evaluating the type of rhythm shown on electrocardiogram tracing to move away from the generic pulseless electrical activity category.

Для цитирования: Gomez Gerardo, Fecher Alison, Joy Theresa, Pardo Ivanesa, Jacobson Lewis, Kemp Heather. Optimizing outcomes in emergency room thoracotomy: a 20-year experience in an urban Level I trauma center.. The American surgeon. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.