MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41394-020-0303-8

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord series and cases · 2020

Neurosyphilis revealed by compressive cervical spine syphilitic gumma: a case report.

Mejdoubi Anasse, Khoulali Mohamed, Raouzi Nabil, Nasri Siham, Mebrouk Yassine, Oulali Noureddine, Moufid Fayçal

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Neurosyphilis is a sexually transmitted disease secondary to the invasion of the central nervous system by the Treponema pallidum. The spinal syphilitic gumma is rare.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of extradural cervical spinal syphilitic gumma revealed by spinal cord compression in a 58-year-old male. The epidural lesion was removed via a posterior approach. Histological examination revealed syphilis. Syphilis serologies were positive. Brain MRI showed an associated cerebro-meningeal syphilitic gumma. Antibiotic regime based on aqueous penicillin G was introduced for 14 days.

DISCUSSION: Currently, there is an increase in the frequency of syphilis and changes in its clinical manifestations. Neurosyphilis can take atypical forms. Spinal syphilitic gumma is a rare manifestation and its association with cerebral involvement is exceptional. Diagnosis is based on serologies in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid. The place of imagery, especially magnetic resonance imaging, is essential. Neurosyphilis should be discussed as a possible differential diagnosis in evaluation of spinal and cerebral lesions.

Для цитирования: Mejdoubi Anasse, Khoulali Mohamed, Raouzi Nabil, Nasri Siham, Mebrouk Yassine, Oulali Noureddine, Moufid Fayçal. Neurosyphilis revealed by compressive cervical spine syphilitic gumma: a case report.. Spinal cord series and cases. 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-020-0303-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.