JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026
Image Integration to Identify Histologic and Electroanatomic Ventricular Scar: A Clinicopathological Study Comparing 2 Image Integration Systems.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Silva Kasun, Campbell Timothy, Bennett Richard G, Turnbull Samual, Bhaskaran Ashwin, Anderson Robert D, Davey Christopher, O'Donohue Alexandra K, Schindeler Aaron, Selvakumar Dinesh, Kotake Yasuhito, Hsu Chi-Jen, Chong James J H, Kizana Eddy, Kumar Saurabh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image integration technologies offer promise to guide delineation of ventricular scar and arrhythmogenic substrate; however, there are limited co-registered histological data or comparative studies of commonly used CMR segmentation tools for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to validate 2 commonly used vendor systems (ADAS-3D and inHEART) to integrate CMR late gadolinium enhancement to electroanatomic mapping in catheter ablation of VT.
METHODS: Five sheep underwent anteroseptal infarction with electroanatomic mapping (129 ± 12 days postinfarct). A whole heart histological model of the postinfarction scar was created. CMR was segmented by ADAS-3D and inHEART and validated with histology for 3 layers (the endocardium, intramural layer, and epicardium). A subsequent clinical validation study was performed with 5 human subjects (1 postinfarction VT, 4 nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Critical sites of VT and functional substrate (deceleration zones) were matched to ADAS-3D and inHEART scar.
RESULTS: CMR-based ADAS-3D and inHEART have comparable accuracy (>75%) with moderate agreement to identify endocardial and intramural scar compared to gold standard whole-heart histology but poorer performance (modest accuracy [60%-68%] and fair agreement in the epicardial layers). Both technologies performed poorly to identify noncompact scar. Critical sites of VT colocalize reliably with ADAS-3D and inHEART scar (88% falling within 1 scar layer). More than 80% of VT critical sites demonstrated CMR late gadolinium enhancement scar in more than 1 layer.
CONCLUSIONS: ADAS-3D and inHEART image integration provide similar characterization of scar distribution and allowed similar display of the anatomic relation of critical re-entry circuit sites detected by mapping to scar. However, limitations exist in the performance of these technologies to identify epicardial and noncompact scar.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to validate 2 commonly used vendor systems (ADAS-3D and inHEART) to integrate CMR late gadolinium enhancement to electroanatomic mapping in catheter ablation of VT.
METHODS: Five sheep underwent anteroseptal infarction with electroanatomic mapping (129 ± 12 days postinfarct). A whole heart histological model of the postinfarction scar was created. CMR was segmented by ADAS-3D and inHEART and validated with histology for 3 layers (the endocardium, intramural layer, and epicardium). A subsequent clinical validation study was performed with 5 human subjects (1 postinfarction VT, 4 nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Critical sites of VT and functional substrate (deceleration zones) were matched to ADAS-3D and inHEART scar.
RESULTS: CMR-based ADAS-3D and inHEART have comparable accuracy (>75%) with moderate agreement to identify endocardial and intramural scar compared to gold standard whole-heart histology but poorer performance (modest accuracy [60%-68%] and fair agreement in the epicardial layers). Both technologies performed poorly to identify noncompact scar. Critical sites of VT colocalize reliably with ADAS-3D and inHEART scar (88% falling within 1 scar layer). More than 80% of VT critical sites demonstrated CMR late gadolinium enhancement scar in more than 1 layer.
CONCLUSIONS: ADAS-3D and inHEART image integration provide similar characterization of scar distribution and allowed similar display of the anatomic relation of critical re-entry circuit sites detected by mapping to scar. However, limitations exist in the performance of these technologies to identify epicardial and noncompact scar.