MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00270-005-0089-x

Медицинская библиотека · Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2006

Treatment of "high-flow" priapism with superselective transcatheter embolization: a useful alternative to surgery.

O'Sullivan P, Browne R, McEniff N, Lee M J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To review the efficacy of treatment of high-flow priapism with superselective transcatheter embolization.

METHODS

Over a 2-year period, we reviewed five patients who were treated for traumatic high-flow priapism with superselective embolization. All patients underwent diagnostic angiography that demonstrated a communication between the cavernosal artery and the corpora cavernosa. Each identified fistula was embolized using gel-foam, blood clot, microcoils, or a combination of these.

RESULTS

All five patients had successful detumesence of priapism postprocedure. There was normal recurrence of early morning erection with successful detumescence for each patient within a 2- to 4-week period. Two of five patients (40%) presented with recurrence of priapism at 6 months and required a repeat embolization procedure. At 1 year, four of the five patients (80%) had normal erectile function.

CONCLUSION

Superselective transcatheter embolization is a useful therapeutic modality in the treatment of high-flow priapism. It provides equivalent rates of detumesence when compared to surgical techniques, and appears to have a greater success in preserving erectile function.

Для цитирования: O'Sullivan P, Browne R, McEniff N, Lee M J. Treatment of "high-flow" priapism with superselective transcatheter embolization: a useful alternative to surgery.. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0089-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.