MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1183/23120541.00518-2023

Медицинская библиотека · ERJ open research · 2024

Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicentre randomised controlled trial: the WheezeScan study.

Do Yen Hoang, van Aalderen Wim, Dellbrügger Ellen, Grenzbach Claude, Grigg Jonathan, Grittner Ulrike, Haarman Eric, Hernandez Toro Camilo José, Karadag Bulent, Roßberg Siri, Weichert Tina-Maria, Whitehouse Abigail, Pizzulli Antonio, Matricardi Paolo Maria, Dramburg Stephanie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Wheezing is common in preschool children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™) on disease control in a home care setting.

METHODS

A multicentre randomised open-label controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4-84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at-home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1) and 4 months (T2).

RESULTS

A total of 167 children, with a mean±sd age of 3.2±1.6 years, were enrolled in the study (intervention group n=87; control group n=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI -2.3-9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.

CONCLUSION

In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of preschool wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behaviour may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.

Для цитирования: Do Yen Hoang, van Aalderen Wim, Dellbrügger Ellen, Grenzbach Claude, Grigg Jonathan, Grittner Ulrike, Haarman Eric, Hernandez Toro Camilo José, Karadag Bulent, Roßberg Siri, Weichert Tina-Maria, Whitehouse Abigail, Pizzulli Antonio, Matricardi Paolo Maria, Dramburg Stephanie. Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicentre randomised controlled trial: the WheezeScan study.. ERJ open research. 2024. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00518-2023.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.