The Science of the total environment · 2006
Linkage study of cancer risk among lead-exposed workers in New Jersey.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lam Thuy V, Agovino Pamela, Niu Xiaoling, Roché Lisa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies have illustrated a possible association between occupational exposure to lead and cancer, specifically cancers of the kidney, lung, stomach, and nervous system. We performed a linkage between two New Jersey databases: the Adult Blood Lead Epidemiology and Surveillance System (ABLES) and the New Jersey State Cancer Registry (NJSCR) for 1985-2001 to ascertain the risk of cancer in lead-exposed workers and to evaluate the usefulness of this type of linkage.
METHODS: A cohort of 3192 men from the ABLES database met the selection criteria before the linkage. AUTOMATCH was used to link the two databases. Person-time was stratified for each worker by five-year age group and calendar year. A standardized incidence ratios (SIR) analysis was performed.
RESULTS: 83 cases of cancer were found among 3165 men after all exclusions were made. Workers were followed for an average of ten years and contributed 30,401 person-years. The SIR analysis showed a large overall deficit of cancer (SIR=0.51; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.62). Cancers of the stomach, breast, larynx, intrahepatic bile duct, and chronic myeloid leukemia were non-significantly elevated. Prostate cancer showed the only statistically significant result, a deficit with an SIR of 0.35 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.57). Deficits also occurred in cancers of the lung, kidney, and brain.
CONCLUSIONS: The results do not indicate that occupational exposure to lead is associated with cancer. However, firm conclusions are not possible because of various study limitations, including small numbers, a large percentage of workers without age information, short follow-up time, and lack of vital status information. Cancer incidence in this cohort was expected to be low due to the Healthy Worker Effect and young age. Further follow-up of this cohort may be warranted since additional cancers may accrue as time from first exposure increases. Increased worker cohort information would also improve this type of study.
METHODS: A cohort of 3192 men from the ABLES database met the selection criteria before the linkage. AUTOMATCH was used to link the two databases. Person-time was stratified for each worker by five-year age group and calendar year. A standardized incidence ratios (SIR) analysis was performed.
RESULTS: 83 cases of cancer were found among 3165 men after all exclusions were made. Workers were followed for an average of ten years and contributed 30,401 person-years. The SIR analysis showed a large overall deficit of cancer (SIR=0.51; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.62). Cancers of the stomach, breast, larynx, intrahepatic bile duct, and chronic myeloid leukemia were non-significantly elevated. Prostate cancer showed the only statistically significant result, a deficit with an SIR of 0.35 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.57). Deficits also occurred in cancers of the lung, kidney, and brain.
CONCLUSIONS: The results do not indicate that occupational exposure to lead is associated with cancer. However, firm conclusions are not possible because of various study limitations, including small numbers, a large percentage of workers without age information, short follow-up time, and lack of vital status information. Cancer incidence in this cohort was expected to be low due to the Healthy Worker Effect and young age. Further follow-up of this cohort may be warranted since additional cancers may accrue as time from first exposure increases. Increased worker cohort information would also improve this type of study.