MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/23744235.2025.2600010

Медицинская библиотека · Infectious diseases (London, England) · 2025

Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems to treat bloodstream infections due to ESBL enterobacterales: a propensity score-matched observational study conducted in an emergency department in Northern Italy.

Capsoni Nicolò, Bettina Marco, Bellone Beatrice, Bossi Ilaria Emanuela, Cantù Lisa, Rossmann Marta, Scarnera Marida, Serrai Irene, Vergani Silvia, Privitera Daniele, Bernasconi Davide Paolo, Puoti Massimo, Merli Marco, Galbiati Filippo, Costantino Giorgio, Bombelli Michele

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin/tazobactam is frequently used empirically in patients subsequently diagnosed with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacterales, yet its effectiveness remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare piperacillin/tazobactam with carbapenems as empirical therapy for BSIs caused by ESBL-Enterobacterales.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective study was conducted at Niguarda Hospital in Milan,Italy, enrolling consecutive patients with BSIs caused by ESBL-Enterobacterales treated empirically with either piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems from January 2015 to December 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Propensity Score Matching(PSM) was employed to mitigate potential confounding factors when assessing the association between empirical therapy and mortality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the role of definitive piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients were included in the study, median age was 72[64-81], 64% were males, 66% had sepsis and 17% septic shock. Among them, 200(76%) received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam and 64(24%) received carbapenems. After PSM adjustment, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups. Patients who received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam had a higher in-hospital mortality compared to those receiving empirical carbapenems (14.3% vs 3.5%, adjusted Risk Difference: 10%;95%CI: 2-19%). No difference in in-hospital mortality was observed when comparing definitive piperacillin/tazobactam to definitive carbapenems (6% vs 9%, Risk Difference: -2.5%; 95%CI: -9.2 - 4.2).

CONCLUSION

Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with higher mortality compared tocarbapenemswhen treating patients with BSI due to ESBL-Enterobacterales. Further larger studies are needed to confirm the results andto identify specific scenarios in which piperacillin/tazobactam may be safely used.

Для цитирования: Capsoni Nicolò, Bettina Marco, Bellone Beatrice, Bossi Ilaria Emanuela, Cantù Lisa, Rossmann Marta, Scarnera Marida, Serrai Irene, Vergani Silvia, Privitera Daniele, Bernasconi Davide Paolo, Puoti Massimo, Merli Marco, Galbiati Filippo, Costantino Giorgio, Bombelli Michele. Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems to treat bloodstream infections due to ESBL enterobacterales: a propensity score-matched observational study conducted in an emergency department in Northern Italy.. Infectious diseases (London, England). 2025. DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2025.2600010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.