MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100892

Медицинская библиотека · Resuscitation plus · 2025

Mechanical chest compression increases intrathoracic hemorrhage complications in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Matsushima Yoshihisa, Shibata Tatsuhiro, Shibao Kodai, Yamakawa Rei, Hayashida Miyu, Yanai Toshiyuki, Ishimatsu Takashi, Homma Takehiro, Nohara Shoichiro, Otsuka Maki, Fukumoto Yoshihiro

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices address the limitations of manual CPR, but their impact on intrathoracic injuries during extracorporeal CPR (ECPR) remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between mechanical CPR and severe intrathoracic hemorrhage during ECPR compared to manual CPR.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent ECPR from April 2017 to March 2024 according to a standard institutional protocol. Patients were divided into a mechanical CPR group (piston-driven compressions before veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [VA-ECMO]) and a manual CPR group. The primary outcome was intrathoracic hemorrhage requiring transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). Secondary outcomes included other intrathoracic injuries and 180-day survival.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were enrolled (mechanical n = 48, manual n = 43). Intrathoracic hemorrhage requiring TAE occurred more frequently in the mechanical CPR group (18.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.030). On multivariate analysis, mechanical CPR was independently associated with this outcome (adjusted odds ratio 6.29; 95% confidence interval 1.20-65.10). In the mechanical group, older age and larger thoracic transverse diameter were significantly related to intrathoracic hemorrhage requiring TAE. Mediastinal hematoma (18.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.030) and hemothorax (20.8% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.049) were also more frequent in the mechanical group. The 180-day survival rates did not differ significantly between groups (27.7% vs. 25.0%, log-rank p = 0.540).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical CPR during ECPR is associated with an increased risk of severe intrathoracic hemorrhage. While mechanical CPR devices may provide benefits in certain scenarios, clinicians should carefully consider individual patient characteristics and closely monitor for complications.

Для цитирования: Matsushima Yoshihisa, Shibata Tatsuhiro, Shibao Kodai, Yamakawa Rei, Hayashida Miyu, Yanai Toshiyuki, Ishimatsu Takashi, Homma Takehiro, Nohara Shoichiro, Otsuka Maki, Fukumoto Yoshihiro. Mechanical chest compression increases intrathoracic hemorrhage complications in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.. Resuscitation plus. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100892.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.