MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/ccid.s315235

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021

Secondary Syphilis in a 12-Year-Old Girl Misdiagnosed as Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta: A Case Report.

Zhang Min, Yu Jia, Huang Hui, Zhou Cunjian, Zhai Zhifang, You Yi, Song Zhiqiang

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Syphilis is a complex, systemic infectious disease caused by Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum. Herein, we report a rare case of secondary syphilis with probable neurosyphilis that was misdiagnosed as pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) in a 12-year-old human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative patient. A female patient presented to our hospital with a four-month history of relapsed systemic rash, accompanied by hair loss, arthralgia and fatigue. Based on physical examination and skin biopsy, she was initially diagnosed as PLEVA and treated both locally and systemically but failed to present a dermatologic improvement. The diagnosis of secondary syphilis with probable neurosyphilis was made based on serologic and cerebrospinal fluid tests. After neurosyphilis therapy, the clinical manifestations of the patient were significantly improved. Physicians should be alert for the possibility of syphilis when encountering cases with unusual clinical manifestations.

Для цитирования: Zhang Min, Yu Jia, Huang Hui, Zhou Cunjian, Zhai Zhifang, You Yi, Song Zhiqiang. Secondary Syphilis in a 12-Year-Old Girl Misdiagnosed as Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta: A Case Report.. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2021. DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s315235.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.