The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2010
Urodynamics or history? Clinical decision-making in women presenting with urinary incontinence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duggan Paul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Preoperative urodynamic testing is recommended by experts, but evidence for clinical benefit is limited.
AIMS: To determine whether urodynamic stress incontinence could be confirmed in women presenting with a history of stress incontinence.
METHODS: History and urodynamic diagnoses of 444 women presenting to a general unit between June 2003 and July 2007 are described.
RESULTS: Urodynamic Stress Incontinence (USI) or mixed USI and detrusor overactivity were observed in 61% reporting any stress incontinence. 15% who reported no stress incontinence had USI. Compared with a normal urodynamic diagnosis, incontinence occurred more frequently in all other diagnostic categories (P < 0.0001) and was worst in the USI and mixed groups (P < 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Urodynamic Stress Incontinence is a more severe entity than stress incontinence diagnosed by history. It is yet to be established if this information benefits patients.
AIMS: To determine whether urodynamic stress incontinence could be confirmed in women presenting with a history of stress incontinence.
METHODS: History and urodynamic diagnoses of 444 women presenting to a general unit between June 2003 and July 2007 are described.
RESULTS: Urodynamic Stress Incontinence (USI) or mixed USI and detrusor overactivity were observed in 61% reporting any stress incontinence. 15% who reported no stress incontinence had USI. Compared with a normal urodynamic diagnosis, incontinence occurred more frequently in all other diagnostic categories (P < 0.0001) and was worst in the USI and mixed groups (P < 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Urodynamic Stress Incontinence is a more severe entity than stress incontinence diagnosed by history. It is yet to be established if this information benefits patients.