MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11102-020-01033-3

Медицинская библиотека · Pituitary · 2020

Multi-syphilitic gummas in pituitary and cerebellopontine angle in a patient.

Xia Kaiguo, Guo Zhangchao, Xia Xiangguo, Ming Yang, Chen Ligang, Li Xianglong, Zhong Chuanhong

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Multi-syphilitic gummas in pituitary and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are extremely rare and easily misdiagnosed especially in patients with antibiotic abuse. We write this paper for clinicians to better understanding of cerebral gumma.

METHODS

We report a patient with syphilitic gummas in pituitary and left CPA. The definite diagnosis is made by histopathology after surgery.

RESULTS

A 49-years-old woman suffered from headaches with tinnitus and hypoacusis in left ear. She was diagnosed with syphilis but untreated. There were no chancre and rashes in the course of disease. Syphilis serological tests were positive. Brain MRI found two masses located in the left CPA and hypophysial fossa. The two masses were removed successively. We found a large number of Treponemapallidum in paraffin-embedded specimens by immunohistochemical staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Syphilitic gummas in pituitary and CPA are similar to benign or malignant brain tumors, easily leading to misdiagnosis. Gumma should be considered in differential diagnosis when a patient has unexplained nervous system symptoms or signs and imaging findings suggest intracranial mass in syphilis seropositive patients.

Для цитирования: Xia Kaiguo, Guo Zhangchao, Xia Xiangguo, Ming Yang, Chen Ligang, Li Xianglong, Zhong Chuanhong. Multi-syphilitic gummas in pituitary and cerebellopontine angle in a patient.. Pituitary. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-020-01033-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.