MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/a-2796-5225

Медицинская библиотека · RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2026

Digital breast tomosynthesis and reading with artificial intelligence.

Weigel Stefanie, Wunderlich Petra, Sommer Alexander, Czwoydzinski Jörg, Baltzer Pascal Andreas Thomas, Dewald Cornelia Lieselotte Angelika, Preibsch Heike, Sauer Stephanie, Siegmann-Luz Katja C, Wenkel Evelyn, Wilpert Caroline, Blum Sophia Freya Ulrike

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) increases sensitivity and specificity compared to digital mammography (DM) in the early detection of breast cancer. The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) for mammographic interpretation resulting in workload reduction is increasingly being reported.

METHOD: Presentation of the current evidence on the efficacy of DBT versus DM in population-based breast cancer screening and its support by AI. Narrative review with topic-led literature search of comparative studies of DBT and DM and review of the use of AI in PubMed from 01/2016 to 09/2025.

RESULTS

In 42 international studies, the breast cancer detection rate was significantly higher with DBT + DM (6.4‰) and DBT + synthetic mammography (SM) (7.4‰) than with DM (4.7‰). Concordantly, the randomized TOSYMA study reported a higher invasive breast cancer detection rate with DBT + SM (7.1‰) versus DM (4.8‰) with a lower false-positive recall rate (first round -15.6‰). The positive predictive value (PPV) of recall was - consistent with meta-analyses - higher (+4.9%), as was the reading time. With a smaller number of AI studies on DBT than DM, a DBT meta-analysis reported a higher sensitivity of AI alone (89%) than by readers (78%), with a lower specificity of AI. DBT with AI-assisted reading compared to human reading alone increased the detection rate in a prospective study by +3.8‰ without a marked change in the recall rate (+0.8%).

CONCLUSION

DBT increases breast cancer detection compared to DM with more favorable process parameters. AI reporting strategies can further increase sensitivity and reduce human workload. The influence of DBT and AI on reducing the interval cancer rate as a measure of efficiency has not yet been proven.

KEY POINTS: · DBT implementation in population-based breast cancer screening is being reviewed internationally.. · In case of DM replacement, AI reading concepts will become more important.. · Evidence of the long-term effectiveness of DBT and AI is limited..

CITATION FORMAT: · Weigel S, Wunderlich P, Sommer A et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis and reading with artificial intelligence. Rofo 2026; DOI 10.1055/a-2796-5225.

Для цитирования: Weigel Stefanie, Wunderlich Petra, Sommer Alexander, Czwoydzinski Jörg, Baltzer Pascal Andreas Thomas, Dewald Cornelia Lieselotte Angelika, Preibsch Heike, Sauer Stephanie, Siegmann-Luz Katja C, Wenkel Evelyn, Wilpert Caroline, Blum Sophia Freya Ulrike. Digital breast tomosynthesis and reading with artificial intelligence.. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2026. DOI: 10.1055/a-2796-5225.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.