Cup-to-Disc Ratio Is Associated with Disability in Multiple Sclerosis: A Combined OCT and Subjective Visual Vertical Study.

Background and

Objectives

Non-invasive biomarkers reflecting neurodegeneration are increasingly important in multiple sclerosis (MS). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides quantitative measures of retinal structure, most commonly peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness. However, the potential clinical relevance of optic nerve head morphology, including cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), remains insufficiently explored. We investigated associations between OCT-derived parameters, subjective visual vertical (SVV), and disability in MS. Materials and

Methods

In this retrospective study, 100 patients with MS were included. OCT parameters (pRNFL thickness and area-based CDR) were analyzed at baseline and follow-up. Clinical disability was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Detailed optic neuritis history was not consistently available in the retrospective clinical records and therefore could not be systematically accounted for in the analyses. SVV was evaluated in 37 patients using a virtual reality-based protocol. Associations were assessed using Spearman correlation and linear regression analyses. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and follow-up duration.

Results

pRNFL thickness was not associated with baseline EDSS (rho = -0.06, p = 0.55) or annualized EDSS change. Baseline CDR correlated with both baseline EDSS (rho = 0.30, p = 0.0065) and follow-up EDSS (rho = 0.46, p < 0.0001). In univariable regression analysis, baseline CDR was associated with follow-up EDSS (B = 3.33, R2 = 0.23, p < 0.0001), remaining significant after adjustment for age, sex, and follow-up duration (B = 2.59, 95% CI 1.26-3.92, p = 0.0002). No significant associations were observed between OCT parameters and SVV measures.

Conclusions

Higher CDR values, but not pRNFL thickness, were associated with disability measures in this exploratory MS cohort. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because optic neuritis history could not be systematically accounted for and physiological optic disc variability may substantially influence CDR measurements.