Aesthetic surgery journal · 2021
Microfat and Nanofat Grafting in Genital Rejuvenation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Menkes Sophie, SidAhmed-Mezi Mounia, Meningaud Jean Paul, Benadiba Laurent, Magalon Guy, Hersant Barbara
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a major problem in many post- or perimenopausal women. Lipofilling has long been considered to be an effective technique for restoring volume, but the discovery of its trophic proprieties has made it the most widely utilized method in regenerative medicine.
OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of microfat and nanofat grafting for vulvovaginal rejuvenation.
METHODS: Women with GSM who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Women received microfat in the labia majora and nanofat in the vagina; follow-up was conducted 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The vaginal health index (VHI) and Female Sexual Distress (FSD) were utilized to assess improvement in vulvovaginal atrophy, orgasm, and sexual desire posttreatment.
RESULTS: Fifty women were included; their average age was 53 years (range, 45-63 years). The VHI score significantly increased at 1 and 3 months after treatment (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the average FSD score showed a significant improvement at 1 and 3 months posttreatment. This score stabilized from 6 to 12 months but showed further improvement at 18 months. At 6 months posttreatment, for both scales, data pertaining to 80% of patients appeared normalized. There was a particular benefit noted for dryness and dyspareunia. At 18 months, the results remained stable for all of patients. No major side effects were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: There are now many ways to rejuvenate the intimate sphere, but microfat and nanofat grafting seem to offer good results with an autologous procedure. Their utilization appears promising for genital rejuvenation.
OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of microfat and nanofat grafting for vulvovaginal rejuvenation.
METHODS: Women with GSM who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Women received microfat in the labia majora and nanofat in the vagina; follow-up was conducted 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The vaginal health index (VHI) and Female Sexual Distress (FSD) were utilized to assess improvement in vulvovaginal atrophy, orgasm, and sexual desire posttreatment.
RESULTS: Fifty women were included; their average age was 53 years (range, 45-63 years). The VHI score significantly increased at 1 and 3 months after treatment (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the average FSD score showed a significant improvement at 1 and 3 months posttreatment. This score stabilized from 6 to 12 months but showed further improvement at 18 months. At 6 months posttreatment, for both scales, data pertaining to 80% of patients appeared normalized. There was a particular benefit noted for dryness and dyspareunia. At 18 months, the results remained stable for all of patients. No major side effects were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: There are now many ways to rejuvenate the intimate sphere, but microfat and nanofat grafting seem to offer good results with an autologous procedure. Their utilization appears promising for genital rejuvenation.