Management of stage pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of the prostate: influence of radical prostatectomy on progression-free interval.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Whether stage pN+ prostate cancer patients will benefit from radical prostatectomy remains a controversial issue. We assess the impact of radical prostatectomy on a progression-free interval for patients with stage pN+ prostate cancer.
METHODS
From October 1990 to June 1997, 25 patients were diagnosed with stage pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of the prostate in our institute. Ten of these patients were treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) due to false-negative frozen sections at staging pelvic lymphadenectomy. In 15 patients, radical surgery was discontinued because of grossly enlarged lymph nodes and/or positive frozen section results during staging pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). All patients received immediate androgen ablation therapy with or without radiotherapy. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was regularly monitored in all patients.
RESULTS
During a median follow-up period of 33 months (range, 15-89 months), eight patients (53%) in the PLND group and two (20%) in the RRP group experienced disease progression as defined by significant elevation of serum PSA concentrations. The median progression-free intervals were 46 and 51 months, respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analyses failed to show statistically significant differences in the progression-free survival between the RRP and PLND groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our limited experience, surgical removal of the primary tumor may have only a marginal effect in terms of the progression-free interval for prostatic cancer patients with metastasized pelvic lymph nodes (p = 0.124, log-rank test). The follow-up period was not long enough to evaluate the difference in cancer-specific survival.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.