Transplantation proceedings · 2024
Renal Transplantation Enhances the Sildenafil Citrate Effectiveness in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction. A Single-Center Perspective.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Hennawy Hany M, Safar Omar, Al Faifi Abdullah S, Shalkamy Osama, Ali Mohammed Abdelrahim, Ali Hossam Hassanen, El Madawie Mahmoud Z, Thamer Saad, Almurayyi Muath, Zaitoun Mohammad F, Elzubair Lina G A, Elatreisy Adel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Sildenafil citrate in the treatment of ED in (HD) compared to post-RT patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A concurrent cohort prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of Sildenafil in the treatment of ED in 24 HD patients (Group A) and 13 patients with persistent ED one-year post-RT (Group B). The initial dose of Sildenafil was 25 mg, increased to 50 mg if there is an adequate response. An Arabic-translated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was completed one week before and after Sildenafil treatment. An IIEF erectile function score of 26 or an improvement of at least 10 points for the total IIEF score was considered a favorable response to Sildenafil.
RESULTS: Group A included 22 patients with a mean age of 47.32 ± 7.013 years, whereas Group B included 13 patients with a mean age of 56.87 ± 9.612 years. The overall efficacy rate of Sildenafil was 40.9% and 76.9% in groups A and B, respectively. The post-treatment IIEF5-15 score increased from 11.1 ± 5.99 to 12.5 ± 6.41 (p = .458) and from 11.82 ± 7.534 to 21.91 ± 5.700 (p = .002) in groups A and B, respectively. In both groups, the duration of HD had no impact on ED improvement except in the post-RT non-responder subgroup. Hypertension, gastrointestinal symptoms, and flushing were both groups' most common side effects.
CONCLUSION: RT could enhance the response to sildenafil in treating patients with ED. The outcome is better in younger post-RT patients with moderate and severe erectile dysfunction and shorter dialysis duration.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A concurrent cohort prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of Sildenafil in the treatment of ED in 24 HD patients (Group A) and 13 patients with persistent ED one-year post-RT (Group B). The initial dose of Sildenafil was 25 mg, increased to 50 mg if there is an adequate response. An Arabic-translated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was completed one week before and after Sildenafil treatment. An IIEF erectile function score of 26 or an improvement of at least 10 points for the total IIEF score was considered a favorable response to Sildenafil.
RESULTS: Group A included 22 patients with a mean age of 47.32 ± 7.013 years, whereas Group B included 13 patients with a mean age of 56.87 ± 9.612 years. The overall efficacy rate of Sildenafil was 40.9% and 76.9% in groups A and B, respectively. The post-treatment IIEF5-15 score increased from 11.1 ± 5.99 to 12.5 ± 6.41 (p = .458) and from 11.82 ± 7.534 to 21.91 ± 5.700 (p = .002) in groups A and B, respectively. In both groups, the duration of HD had no impact on ED improvement except in the post-RT non-responder subgroup. Hypertension, gastrointestinal symptoms, and flushing were both groups' most common side effects.
CONCLUSION: RT could enhance the response to sildenafil in treating patients with ED. The outcome is better in younger post-RT patients with moderate and severe erectile dysfunction and shorter dialysis duration.