MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/01421590802572767

Медицинская библиотека · Medical teacher · 2010

The development of a new cardiac auscultation test: How do screening and diagnostic skills differ?

Nielsen Tommy, Mølgaard Henning, Ringsted Charlotte, Eika Berit

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Newly qualified doctors are expected to be able to conduct a cardiac auscultation unassisted, but studies show conflicting results regarding cardiac auscultation skills.

METHODS

A two-part test instrument was designed containing innovative recordings of heart sounds from patients with common cardiac murmurs as well as healthy controls. A total number of 109 participants were tested, representing four levels of clinical experience. The content validity of the test instrument was studied by a postal questionnaire to 114 clinical teachers at the University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was found between level of experience and the ability to diagnose the conditions from which the murmurs originated (r = 0.45, P < 0.0001). No correlation was found between level of experience and the ability to identify persons with cardiac murmurs from healthy controls. All groups showed a tendency to interpret healthy heart sounds as cardiac murmurs.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic ability was found to correlate positively with clinical experience, whereas the ability to distinguish cardiac murmurs from normal heart sounds seems independent of clinical experience.

Для цитирования: Nielsen Tommy, Mølgaard Henning, Ringsted Charlotte, Eika Berit. The development of a new cardiac auscultation test: How do screening and diagnostic skills differ?. Medical teacher. 2010. DOI: 10.3109/01421590802572767.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.