DOI 10.1097/bot.0000000000001309
A Comparison of the Open Semi-extended Parapatellar Versus Standard Entry Tibial Nailing Techniques and Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine if an open, semi-extended, parapatellar tibial nailing technique (SEK) imparts any undue knee symptoms/pain compared with the traditional infrapatellar tibial nailing technique (FK).
DESIGN
Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
Level 1 trauma center.
PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients with OTA/AO 42A-C tibial shaft fractures were included in the study.
INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to treatment with either a SEK or an FK technique.
MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome was a symptoms subset of the International Knee Documentation Committee (SS-IKDC) pertaining to knee symptoms/pain.
RESULTS
Final follow-up was collected at 1 year for 24 SEK and 23 FK patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in regards to demographics, injury, or surgery-related variables. The 2 techniques did have equivalent symptoms scores [mean for the difference (SEK - FK): 0.29, 90% confidence interval: -4.16 to 4.75] but did not have equivalent pain scores [mean for the difference (SEK - FK): 0.2, 90% confidence interval: -3.18 to 3.59]. When comparing demographic and injury-related variables to the SS-IKDC, only Kellgren-Lawrence classification was statistically significant (P = 0.026), where increasing presence of osteoarthritis was associated with lower scores.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this single-center randomized controlled trial show that SEK and FK techniques for tibial nailing are equivalent in regards to knee symptoms (defined as ±5 points on the SS-IKDC) but not specifically pain that showed trends toward decreasing knee pain with the open SEK technique. This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that the use of the open semi-extended, parapatellar technique for tibial nailing should not be associated with any higher likelihood of knee pain/symptoms than the traditional flexed knee, infrapatellar technique.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.