DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.07.030
Evaluation, etiology, and management of gross hematuria following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To assess the etiology, evaluation, and subsequent management of patients who developed gross hematuria following radical cystectomy (RC) and orthotopic neobladder (ONB) urinary diversion.
METHODS
All patients who underwent RC and ONB between 2017 and 2021 and later developed gross hematuria necessitating cystoscopy were identified. Patient demographics, cystoscopy reports, cytology findings, and relevant imaging were reviewed to determine the etiology of hematuria, the subsequent management, and the ultimate outcome. Causes of hematuria were categorized as recurrence, inflammation/infection, anticoagulation-related, or undetermined.
RESULTS
Twenty-one patients underwent cystoscopy for gross hematuria following RC and ONB during the study period. Most patients were male (n = 19, 90.5%), and the median age was 71 years (IQR: 67-75). Five (23.8%) patients had hematuria secondary to cancer recurrence-4 urethral and one upper tract recurrence. Other etiologies of hematuria included pouchitis (n = 5, 23.8%) and presumed anticoagulation-related bleeding (n = 2, 9.5%). In 9 (42.9%) patients, the etiology of hematuria remained undetermined despite comprehensive workup. Among the 5 patients whose hematuria was secondary to cancer recurrence, the median time from cystectomy to hematuria was 29 months (Interquartile range: 15-36).
CONCLUSIONS
Up to a quarter of patients who present with gross hematuria following RC with ONB may have cancer recurrence. Consequently, a thorough evaluation is warranted in all patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.