Prenatal diagnosis · 2001
Reliability of prenatal sonographic lung biometry in the diagnosis of pulmonary hypoplasia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heling K S, Tennstedt C, Chaoui R, Kalache K D, Hartung J, Bollmann R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to assess the value of biometric lung measurements for the diagnosis of severe fetal pulmonary hypoplasia by investigating whether a significant correlation between two-dimensional lung biometry measurements and autopsy findings could be established.
METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out between 1995 and 1997. Nomograms for normal fetuses of the anterior-posterior and transverse inner thoracic diameters, which describe the growth and shape of the lung, were used as a basis for diagnosis of pulmonary hypoplasia in fetuses at high risk of developing the condition (the fetuses had bilateral renal agenesis or multicystic kidneys; chronic PROM <25 gestational weeks or hydrothorax). Pregnancy was terminated by abortion or intrauterine death in 29/43 high-risk fetuses and autopsies were performed. Only the 29 fetuses for which there were autopsy findings were included in the study.
RESULTS: The best plane for diagnosing pulmonary hypoplasia was the four-chamber view. The diagnostic accuracy for this view as expressed by the sensitivity was 57% for the anterior-posterior diameter and 44% for the transverse diameter; as expressed by the specificity it was 42% for the anterior-posterior diameter and 50% for the transverse diameter. The results for the four-chamber view for the various high-risk conditions were as follows: for fetuses with chronic PROM we obtained sensitivities of 75% and 50% (anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions, respectively) and specificities of 80% and 60% (anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions, respectively). The sensitivities of lung biometry in fetuses with hydrothorax were 1% and 80% for the two diameters, but there was a low specificity. In fetuses with bilateral renal agenesis or multicystic kidneys we obtained sensitivities of 36% and 30% (anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions, respectively) and a specificity of 50% (anterior-posterior dimension).
CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that two-dimensional lung biometry is not a suitable method for antenatal detection of pulmonary hypoplasia. However, in individual cases with high risk for pulmonary hypoplasia, lung biometry might prove to be an additional diagnostic parameter.
METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out between 1995 and 1997. Nomograms for normal fetuses of the anterior-posterior and transverse inner thoracic diameters, which describe the growth and shape of the lung, were used as a basis for diagnosis of pulmonary hypoplasia in fetuses at high risk of developing the condition (the fetuses had bilateral renal agenesis or multicystic kidneys; chronic PROM <25 gestational weeks or hydrothorax). Pregnancy was terminated by abortion or intrauterine death in 29/43 high-risk fetuses and autopsies were performed. Only the 29 fetuses for which there were autopsy findings were included in the study.
RESULTS: The best plane for diagnosing pulmonary hypoplasia was the four-chamber view. The diagnostic accuracy for this view as expressed by the sensitivity was 57% for the anterior-posterior diameter and 44% for the transverse diameter; as expressed by the specificity it was 42% for the anterior-posterior diameter and 50% for the transverse diameter. The results for the four-chamber view for the various high-risk conditions were as follows: for fetuses with chronic PROM we obtained sensitivities of 75% and 50% (anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions, respectively) and specificities of 80% and 60% (anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions, respectively). The sensitivities of lung biometry in fetuses with hydrothorax were 1% and 80% for the two diameters, but there was a low specificity. In fetuses with bilateral renal agenesis or multicystic kidneys we obtained sensitivities of 36% and 30% (anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions, respectively) and a specificity of 50% (anterior-posterior dimension).
CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that two-dimensional lung biometry is not a suitable method for antenatal detection of pulmonary hypoplasia. However, in individual cases with high risk for pulmonary hypoplasia, lung biometry might prove to be an additional diagnostic parameter.