Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026
Bone-Anchored Prostheses: Leveling the Playing Field for Individuals With Transfemoral Amputation-A Comparative Cohort Study of Patients Undergoing Single-Stage Osseointegration Versus High-Functioning Users of Socket-Suspended Prostheses.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meouchi Enrique Alberto Vargas, Castillo Luis Vila, Amuchastegui Julen Irizar, Crespo-Fresno Almudena, Issa-Benítez Daniela, Corona Pablo S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate functional outcomes, prosthesis usage, pain, and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) with severe socket-related problems undergoing single-stage osseointegration (OI) as the bone-anchored prostheses (BAP) group, compared with high-functioning socket-suspended prostheses (SSP) users.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational, comparative cohort study with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Before-and-after analysis in the BAP group and between-group comparison at follow-up.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center for amputee rehabilitation and limb reconstruction.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven adults (N=37) with nonchronic vascular, nondiabetic TFA. Sixteen underwent single-stage OI because of severe socket-related complications. Twenty-one were functionally successful SSP users. All had ≥12 months of prosthesis use and complete datasets.
INTERVENTIONS: Single-stage transfemoral OI in the BAP group. The SSP group followed the institutional protocol and received no intervention.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prosthesis wear time (h/d), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), pain via visual analog scale (VAS), and QoL via EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire and 36-Item Short Form Survey. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were performed in the BAP group; 12-month outcomes were compared between groups. OI-related complications were recorded.
RESULTS: BAP users showed significant improvements at 12 months: prosthesis usage increased from 0 to 13.9 h/d (P<.001), 6MWT distance improved from 307 to 411 m (P=.002), VAS pain scores decreased from 6.5 to 1.8 (P<.001), and QoL improved across multiple domains. Compared with the SSP group, BAP users had similar 6MWT distances and QoL scores at 12 months, but reported significantly lower pain (VAS 1.8 vs 3.5; P=.041). Satisfaction was high: 88% rated 10 of 10 and 94% would repeat the procedure. Complications were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage OI significantly improves function, prosthesis use, and QoL in TFA with socket intolerance, achieving outcomes comparable with high-functioning SSP users. Pain reduction is a notable benefit, supporting broader consideration of OI in carefully selected individuals.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational, comparative cohort study with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Before-and-after analysis in the BAP group and between-group comparison at follow-up.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center for amputee rehabilitation and limb reconstruction.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven adults (N=37) with nonchronic vascular, nondiabetic TFA. Sixteen underwent single-stage OI because of severe socket-related complications. Twenty-one were functionally successful SSP users. All had ≥12 months of prosthesis use and complete datasets.
INTERVENTIONS: Single-stage transfemoral OI in the BAP group. The SSP group followed the institutional protocol and received no intervention.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prosthesis wear time (h/d), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), pain via visual analog scale (VAS), and QoL via EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire and 36-Item Short Form Survey. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were performed in the BAP group; 12-month outcomes were compared between groups. OI-related complications were recorded.
RESULTS: BAP users showed significant improvements at 12 months: prosthesis usage increased from 0 to 13.9 h/d (P<.001), 6MWT distance improved from 307 to 411 m (P=.002), VAS pain scores decreased from 6.5 to 1.8 (P<.001), and QoL improved across multiple domains. Compared with the SSP group, BAP users had similar 6MWT distances and QoL scores at 12 months, but reported significantly lower pain (VAS 1.8 vs 3.5; P=.041). Satisfaction was high: 88% rated 10 of 10 and 94% would repeat the procedure. Complications were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage OI significantly improves function, prosthesis use, and QoL in TFA with socket intolerance, achieving outcomes comparable with high-functioning SSP users. Pain reduction is a notable benefit, supporting broader consideration of OI in carefully selected individuals.