Journal of neurosurgery · 2020
Predictors of ventriculostomy infection in a large single-center cohort.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sweid Ahmad, Weinberg Joshua H, Abbas Rawad, El Naamani Kareem, Tjoumakaris Stavropoula, Wamsley Christine, Mann Erica J, Neely Christopher, Head Jeffery, Nauheim David, Hauge Julie, Gooch M Reid, Herial Nabeel, Zarzour Hekmat, Alexander Tyler D, Missios Symeon, Hasan David, Chalouhi Nohra, Harrop James, Rosenwasser Robert H, Jabbour Pascal
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common neurosurgical procedure. While this procedure is simple and effective, infection is a major limiting factor. Factors predictive of infection reported in the literature are not conclusive. The aim of this retrospective, single-center large series was to assess the rate and independent predictors of ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI).
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent EVD placement between January 2012 and January 2018.
RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included in the study. The infection rate was 3.1% (n = 12). Variables that were significantly associated with VAI were EVD replacement (OR 10, p = 0.001), bilateral EVDs (OR 9.2, p = 0.009), duration of EVD placement (OR 1.1, p = 0.011), increased CSF output/day (OR 1.0, p = 0.001), CSF leak (OR 12.9, p = 0.001), and increased length of hospital stay (OR 1.1, p = 0.002). Using multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of VAI were female sex (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.1-47.4; p = 0.043), EVD replacement (OR 8.5, 95% CI 1.44-50.72; p = 0.027), increased CSF output/day (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0-1.02; p = 0.023), and CSF leak (OR 15.1, 95% CI 2.6-87.1; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VAI was 3.1%. Routine CSF collection (every other day or every 3 days) and CSF collection when needed were not associated with VAI. The authors recommend CSF collection when clinically needed rather than routinely.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent EVD placement between January 2012 and January 2018.
RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included in the study. The infection rate was 3.1% (n = 12). Variables that were significantly associated with VAI were EVD replacement (OR 10, p = 0.001), bilateral EVDs (OR 9.2, p = 0.009), duration of EVD placement (OR 1.1, p = 0.011), increased CSF output/day (OR 1.0, p = 0.001), CSF leak (OR 12.9, p = 0.001), and increased length of hospital stay (OR 1.1, p = 0.002). Using multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of VAI were female sex (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.1-47.4; p = 0.043), EVD replacement (OR 8.5, 95% CI 1.44-50.72; p = 0.027), increased CSF output/day (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0-1.02; p = 0.023), and CSF leak (OR 15.1, 95% CI 2.6-87.1; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VAI was 3.1%. Routine CSF collection (every other day or every 3 days) and CSF collection when needed were not associated with VAI. The authors recommend CSF collection when clinically needed rather than routinely.