The Journal of hand surgery · 2014
Ultrasound-assisted closed reduction of distal radius fractures.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kodama Narihito, Takemura Yoshinori, Ueba Hiroaki, Imai Shinji, Matsusue Yoshitaka
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and ability of ultrasound for monitoring closed reduction for distal radius fractures.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided closed reduction of acute, displaced distal radius fractures between January 2003 and December 2006 at our department were enrolled. The control group was extracted from patients who underwent a closed reduction for similar fractures under fluoroscopy or without any imaging assistance. To confirm the accuracy of the ultrasonography measurements, displacement distance values were compared with those on radiographic imaging before and after reduction. X-ray parameters for pre- and postreduction, reduction time, total cost, and success rate were compared between the ultrasound-guided and the control groups.
RESULTS: The ultrasound-guided group consisted of 43 patients (mean age, 68 y) and the control group consisted of 57 patients, which included 35 patients (mean age, 74 y) with fluoroscopic reduction and of 22 patients (mean age, 72 y) with reduction unaided by imaging. There were no significant displacement differences between radiographic and ultrasound measurements. In x-ray parameters for pre- and postreduction, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Ultrasound-guided reduction took longer than the other 2 methods. The success rate of the ultrasound and the fluoroscopic groups were similar (95% and 94%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ultrasound assistance can aid reduction of distal radius fractures as well as fluoroscopy.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided closed reduction of acute, displaced distal radius fractures between January 2003 and December 2006 at our department were enrolled. The control group was extracted from patients who underwent a closed reduction for similar fractures under fluoroscopy or without any imaging assistance. To confirm the accuracy of the ultrasonography measurements, displacement distance values were compared with those on radiographic imaging before and after reduction. X-ray parameters for pre- and postreduction, reduction time, total cost, and success rate were compared between the ultrasound-guided and the control groups.
RESULTS: The ultrasound-guided group consisted of 43 patients (mean age, 68 y) and the control group consisted of 57 patients, which included 35 patients (mean age, 74 y) with fluoroscopic reduction and of 22 patients (mean age, 72 y) with reduction unaided by imaging. There were no significant displacement differences between radiographic and ultrasound measurements. In x-ray parameters for pre- and postreduction, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Ultrasound-guided reduction took longer than the other 2 methods. The success rate of the ultrasound and the fluoroscopic groups were similar (95% and 94%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ultrasound assistance can aid reduction of distal radius fractures as well as fluoroscopy.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleFluoroscopyFollow-Up StudiesFracture FixationFracture HealingHumansInjury Severity ScoreJoint DislocationsMaleManipulation, OrthopedicMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRadius FracturesRange of Motion, ArticularReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalWrist JointYoung Adult