Wellcome open research · 2026
Implementation of 7-1-7 for improving timeliness in outbreak detection and response in Thailand: A mixed-methods study on challenges in application and achievement of targets in 2024-25.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watakulsin Peeriya, Jitpeera Charuttaporn, Promduangsi Pitiphon, Yueayai Khanuengnij, Wongsanuphat Suphanat, Yeesoonsang Seesai, Plernprom Patchanee, Siri Chonlada, Kuljirakul Kanyanach, Thintha Thitinan, Songkram Kannika, Charoensiwarak Kulchayada, Hinjoy Soawapak
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Infectious disease outbreaks result in unfavourable outcomes when swift actions fail. The 7-1-7 target (detect within 7 days, notify within 1 day, respond within 7 days) was proposed to improve timeliness. Thailand piloted 7-1-7 in 2024 and scaled it up nationwide in 2025. This study aimed to quantify the 7-1-7 target achievement, identify bottlenecks and enablers, and describe challenges and solutions for applying the 7-1-7 metrics.
METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted with quantitative assessment of all events meeting the national health threat criteria during January 2024 and June 2025 for timeliness, bottlenecks and enablers for meeting the 7-1-7 target. A qualitative descriptive study with in-depth interviews of key stakeholders explored challenges and solutions for applying the 7-1-7 framework.
RESULTS: Of the 1,435 events assessed, 15% were dangerous communicable diseases and 3% occurred in hotels. Among all the events, 50% achieved the 7-1-7 target; 85%, 73%, and 83% were detected, notified and responded to in a timely manner, respectively. The median (interquartile range) duration for detection, notification and response were 0 (0-5) days, 0 (0-2) days and 2 (0-5) days, respectively. Among events that occurred in hotels, none met the 7-1-7 target. Dangerous communicable diseases had the highest notification (95%) and response performance (99%), despite lower timely detection (71%). Key bottlenecks included delayed care-seeking and weak coordination. Key stakeholders felt that the 7-1-7 metrics was useful, but the lack of standardised data sources, disease-specific guidelines and centralised data extraction made implementation difficult. Proposed solutions focused on streamlining and decentralizing the application of 7-1-7.
CONCLUSION: It is appreciable that Thailand was able to apply the 7-1-7 framework and half of the events met the 7-1-7 target. However, to better the application of 7-1-7, future work should focus on strengthening data integration and formulating disease specific guidelines.
METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted with quantitative assessment of all events meeting the national health threat criteria during January 2024 and June 2025 for timeliness, bottlenecks and enablers for meeting the 7-1-7 target. A qualitative descriptive study with in-depth interviews of key stakeholders explored challenges and solutions for applying the 7-1-7 framework.
RESULTS: Of the 1,435 events assessed, 15% were dangerous communicable diseases and 3% occurred in hotels. Among all the events, 50% achieved the 7-1-7 target; 85%, 73%, and 83% were detected, notified and responded to in a timely manner, respectively. The median (interquartile range) duration for detection, notification and response were 0 (0-5) days, 0 (0-2) days and 2 (0-5) days, respectively. Among events that occurred in hotels, none met the 7-1-7 target. Dangerous communicable diseases had the highest notification (95%) and response performance (99%), despite lower timely detection (71%). Key bottlenecks included delayed care-seeking and weak coordination. Key stakeholders felt that the 7-1-7 metrics was useful, but the lack of standardised data sources, disease-specific guidelines and centralised data extraction made implementation difficult. Proposed solutions focused on streamlining and decentralizing the application of 7-1-7.
CONCLUSION: It is appreciable that Thailand was able to apply the 7-1-7 framework and half of the events met the 7-1-7 target. However, to better the application of 7-1-7, future work should focus on strengthening data integration and formulating disease specific guidelines.