MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.07.010

Медицинская библиотека · Heart & lung : the journal of critical care · 2024

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical benefits and adverse reactions of anti-fibrotics in non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD.

Chong Woon Hean, Agrawal Dipika, Tan Ze Ying, Venkateswaran Sridhar, Tan Adeline Yit Ying, Tan Ching Yee, Ling Norris Chun Ang, Tay Noel Stanley Wey Tut

Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Anti-fibrotics can reduce restrictive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its effectiveness in non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

We assess the efficacy and safety of anti-fibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib versus placebo among non-IPF PF-ILD adult patients.

METHODS

Meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). At respective centers, non-IPF PF-ILD was defined as clinical and radiological findings inconsistent with IPF and greater than 5 % forced vital capacity (FVC) decline, worsening radiological fibrosis or respiratory symptoms.

RESULTS

Among seven RCTs involving 1,816 non-IPF PF-ILD patients, anti-fibrotics significantly reduced decline in FVC from baseline in milliliters (MD -66.80milliliters; P < 0.01) and percent predicted (MD -1.80 %; P < 0.01) compared to placebo. However, severity of FVC decline was less than 10 % (P = 0.33) in both groups. No significant difference in the decline of 6MWD from baseline in meters (P = 0.19) while on anti-fibrotics, although those on pirfenidone had less decline in 6MWD (MD -25.12 m; P < 0.01) versus placebo. The rates of all-cause mortality (P = 0.34), all-cause hospitalization (P = 0.44), and hospitalization for respiratory etiology (P = 0.06) were comparable in both groups. Adverse events of nausea/vomiting (54.2 % vs. 20.3 %; P < 0.01), diarrhea (65.2 % vs. 27.6 %; P = 0.02), anorexia/weight loss (23.0 % vs. 7.7 %; P < 0.01), neurological disorders (20.8 % vs. 12.6 %; P < 0.01), and events requiring therapy discontinuation were higher (18.4 % vs. 9.9 %; P < 0.01) in the anti-fibrotic group. Other adverse events of skin (P = 0.18) and respiratory disorders (P = 0.20) were equal.

CONCLUSION

The advent of anti-fibrotics offers alternative treatment to reduce lung function decline.

Для цитирования: Chong Woon Hean, Agrawal Dipika, Tan Ze Ying, Venkateswaran Sridhar, Tan Adeline Yit Ying, Tan Ching Yee, Ling Norris Chun Ang, Tay Noel Stanley Wey Tut. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical benefits and adverse reactions of anti-fibrotics in non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD.. Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.07.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.