MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/vmi/6524636

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary medicine international · 2026

Prevalence of Unregistered, Substandard, and Falsified Veterinary Antimicrobials in Ethiopia: A National Postmarket Quality Surveillance Study.

Tefera Belachew, Bacha Belachew, Tefera Nardos, Uma Gudeta, Setegn Tadese, Belete Bizuayehu, Daba Diriba, Jemal Dinsefa, Tefera Yilak, Bedu Hussen, Tilki Tamiru, Hailemichael Dagnachew, Kebede Solomon, Jemal Hamid, Marew Tesfa, Teshome Dawit, Gedif Teferi, Gelaye Esayas, Andualem Tenaw, Ashenef Ayenew

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The proliferation of unregistered, substandard, and falsified (SF) veterinary pharmaceuticals represents a critical global threat to animal health, food security, and environmental conservation. In sub-Saharan Africa, these products exacerbate the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), potentially accelerating the transition toward a "post-antibiotic" era. Despite Ethiopia's relatively developed regulatory framework compared to neighboring states, vulnerabilities such as inadequate diagnostic facilities, porous supply chains, and limited postmarketing surveillance results in enforcement persist.

OBJECTIVE

This descriptive study was conducted to determine the prevalence and quality profile of selected veterinary antimicrobials, including antibacterials, anthelmintics, and antiprotozoals, circulating in the Ethiopian market.

METHODS

Postmarket quality surveillance (PMS) study was conducted across five administrative regions. A total of 142 samples were collected and evaluated through three distinct regulatory tiers: verification of Ethiopian Agricultural Authority (EAA) registration status, standardized visual/physical screening, and official pharmacopeial (compendial) laboratory testing.

RESULTS

The majority of sampled products (95.7%) were imported, predominantly from China (75.7%) and India (15.0%). Primary sampling sites included veterinary retail outlets (50.7%) and clinics (22.9%). Regulatory analysis revealed that 17.9% (n = 25) of samples were unregistered. Visual screening identified an administrative substandard prevalence of 24.3% among registered products. Of the 44 samples subjected to compendial laboratory analysis, 22.7% (n = 10) failed to meet established pharmacopeial specifications. While suspected falsified products were identified through labeling discrepancies, laboratory confirmation of falsification is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

Unregistered and substandard veterinary medicines are circulating in the Ethiopian supply chain, posing severe risks to animal health and contributing to the regional AMR crisis. These findings necessitate urgent, concerted efforts from stakeholders to strengthen the national regulatory system, enhance EAA laboratory capacity, and secure the pharmaceutical supply chain through targeted postmarketing enforcement.

Для цитирования: Tefera Belachew, Bacha Belachew, Tefera Nardos, Uma Gudeta, Setegn Tadese, Belete Bizuayehu, Daba Diriba, Jemal Dinsefa, Tefera Yilak, Bedu Hussen, Tilki Tamiru, Hailemichael Dagnachew, Kebede Solomon, Jemal Hamid, Marew Tesfa, Teshome Dawit, Gedif Teferi, Gelaye Esayas, Andualem Tenaw, Ashenef Ayenew. Prevalence of Unregistered, Substandard, and Falsified Veterinary Antimicrobials in Ethiopia: A National Postmarket Quality Surveillance Study.. Veterinary medicine international. 2026. DOI: 10.1155/vmi/6524636.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.