[Reconstruction of large nasal defects with lateral nasal artery pedicled nasolabial flap].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the curative effect of the lateral nasal artery pedicled nasolabial flap for reconstruction of nasal defects.
METHODS
From August 2005 to March 2009, 12 cases of large nasal tip and alar defects were repaired with the lateral nasal artery pedicled nasolabial flap. There were 5 male patients and 7 female patients with a mean age of 48.6 years (range, 35-60 years). Five cases of nasal defects were caused by trauma and other defects were caused by excision of carcinoma or hemangioma; the courses of disease were 1 to 10 years and 3 months to 40 years, respectively. The nasal defect size ranged from 2.0 cm x 1.5 cm to 4.5 cm x 2.5 cm. All defects were reconstructed with lateral nasal artery pedicled nasolabial flap in 9 cases and with island flap in 3 cases. The flap size ranged from 2.5 cm x 2.0 cm to 7.0 cm x 3.0 cm. Five patients required cartilage grafts for alar rim support and the distal end of the nasolabial flap was thinned and folded to repair the nasal lining. The donor sites were sutured directly.
RESULTS
The mild venous stasis at the distal end of three island flaps occurred at 5-24 hours postoperatively and alleviated spontaneously. All flaps survived. Incision at donor and accepted sites healed by first intention. Flap revision was performed in 5 cases after 6-15 months because of mild swelling at the pedicles of skin flaps. All patients were followed up 8-24 months, with an average of 13 months. All patients achieved satisfactory results in nasal appearance, flap texture and color, and ventilatory function. No obvious scar was found at donor sites.
CONCLUSION
The nasolabial flap is an excellent choice for reconstruction of defects of nasal tip and ala.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.