Poultry science · 2024
Comparison of gamithromycin residue depletion in yellow-feather and white-feather broilers after one single subcutaneous injection.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Xing-Ping, Liang Jun, Li Ze-En, Duan Ming-Hui, Dai Yan, Zhang Yan-Ni, Liu Yue, Jin Yang-Guang, Yang Fan
Аннотация
This study aimed to compare the residue depletion of gamithromycin in yellow-feather and white-feather broilers, using Sanhuang and Arbor Acres chickens as typical examples, respectively. Each breed (54 chickens) received a single subcutaneous dose of gamithromycin at 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight (BW). Tissues, including muscle, skin + fat, liver, kidney, and injection site, were collected at 6 h, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d postdrug administration. Gamithromycin concentrations in these tissues were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The kinetics of gamithromycin were analyzed in different tissues using a noncompartmental method in the Phoenix software. Differences were observed in gamithromycin concentrations and kinetic characteristics in both breeds of chickens, with higher residue concentrations and longer residue times found in yellow-feathered broilers. In Sanhuang broilers, the elimination rates of gamithromycin followed this order: injection site > muscle > liver > kidney > skin + fat. The corresponding elimination half-lives (t1/2λzs) in these samples were 1.22, 1.30, 1.71, 2.04, and 2.52 d, respectively. In contrast, in Arbor Acres broilers, a different order was noted: muscle > injection site > kidney > liver > skin + fat, with corresponding t1/2λzs of 1, 1.23, 1.88, 1.93, and 2.21 d, respectively. These differences may be related to variations in pigments in various tissues of chickens of the 2 breeds. However, further investigations are warranted to discern the underlying reasons.