The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2016
Trends, in Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome by Specialty.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uliassi Nicole, Sullivan Shannon, Damle Lauren, Gomez-Lobo Veronica
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.
STUDY DESIGN: Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.
RESULTS: Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.
CONCLUSION: Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.
STUDY DESIGN: Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.
RESULTS: Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.
CONCLUSION: Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultContraceptives, Oral, HormonalDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDiureticsEndocrinologistsFemaleGeneral PractitionersGynecologyHumansHydrocortisoneHypoglycemic AgentsLife StyleLipidsMetforminPioglitazonePolycystic Ovary SyndromePractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesSpironolactoneYoung Adult