Journal of pediatric surgery · 2015
A comparison of parecoxib and thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia following Nuss procedure.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Wendy, Ming Yung-Ching, Kau Yi-Chuan, Liao Chia-Chih, Tsai Shih-Chang, Wong Kit-Man, Wong Shu-Yam, Lai Jin-Yao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and parecoxib in controlling postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure.
METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2014, 120 adolescents and adults underwent Nuss procedures and received either TEA or parecoxib for postoperative pain control. Demographic data, preoperative preparation times, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores from postoperative day 1 to day 5, medical costs of pain control, days to Foley catheter removal, days to being able to sit up, days to being able to walk, days of hospital stay, nausea/vomiting scores, and complications related to pain control were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients received TEA, and 14 received parecoxib. No between-group differences in demographics were observed. Patients in the parecoxib group had shorter preparation times (p<0.001), lower VAS pain scores from postoperative day 2 to day 5 (day 2, p=0.006; day 3, p=0.006; day 4, p<0.001; day 5, p<0.001), shorter hospital stays (p<0.001), lower pain control costs (p<0.001), and lower nausea/vomiting scores (p=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: For adolescents and adults undergoing the Nuss procedure, parecoxib affords better pain control efficacy, a shorter hospital stay, lower medical pain control costs, and fewer side effects compared with TEA.
METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2014, 120 adolescents and adults underwent Nuss procedures and received either TEA or parecoxib for postoperative pain control. Demographic data, preoperative preparation times, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores from postoperative day 1 to day 5, medical costs of pain control, days to Foley catheter removal, days to being able to sit up, days to being able to walk, days of hospital stay, nausea/vomiting scores, and complications related to pain control were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients received TEA, and 14 received parecoxib. No between-group differences in demographics were observed. Patients in the parecoxib group had shorter preparation times (p<0.001), lower VAS pain scores from postoperative day 2 to day 5 (day 2, p=0.006; day 3, p=0.006; day 4, p<0.001; day 5, p<0.001), shorter hospital stays (p<0.001), lower pain control costs (p<0.001), and lower nausea/vomiting scores (p=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: For adolescents and adults undergoing the Nuss procedure, parecoxib affords better pain control efficacy, a shorter hospital stay, lower medical pain control costs, and fewer side effects compared with TEA.