A comparison of parecoxib and thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia following Nuss procedure.

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and parecoxib in controlling postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure.

METHODS

Between August 2005 and July 2014, 120 adolescents and adults underwent Nuss procedures and received either TEA or parecoxib for postoperative pain control. Demographic data, preoperative preparation times, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores from postoperative day 1 to day 5, medical costs of pain control, days to Foley catheter removal, days to being able to sit up, days to being able to walk, days of hospital stay, nausea/vomiting scores, and complications related to pain control were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients received TEA, and 14 received parecoxib. No between-group differences in demographics were observed. Patients in the parecoxib group had shorter preparation times (p<0.001), lower VAS pain scores from postoperative day 2 to day 5 (day 2, p=0.006; day 3, p=0.006; day 4, p<0.001; day 5, p<0.001), shorter hospital stays (p<0.001), lower pain control costs (p<0.001), and lower nausea/vomiting scores (p=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

For adolescents and adults undergoing the Nuss procedure, parecoxib affords better pain control efficacy, a shorter hospital stay, lower medical pain control costs, and fewer side effects compared with TEA.