MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jsap.70127

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of small animal practice · 2026

Development of standard consensus definitions for infectious urinary tract disease in dogs and cats, a modified Delphi study.

Weese J S, Allerton F, Scahill K, Sørensen T M, Jessen L R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To develop consensus-based definitions for infectious urinary tract disease in dogs and cats.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A modified Delphi approach was used to develop consensus on standard terminology and definitions.

RESULTS

Four rounds of review were performed with two different expert and stakeholder audiences. The four rounds of review involved 19, 16, 90 and 52 participants, respectively. Consensus was reached for a collection of 29 terms and associated definitions, and one set of cut-off values.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Standardisation of terminology is a foundational component of clinical communication, surveillance and guideline development. Unclear or variable definitions have commonly been present in studies of urinary tract disease in dogs and cats, causing confusion and hampering evidence assessment. Development of a set of standardised terms and definitions based on broad stakeholder consensus should assist with diagnosis, communication, surveillance and clinical research, improving the evidence base pertaining to infectious urinary tract disease and fostering improved clinical guidance.

Для цитирования: Weese J S, Allerton F, Scahill K, Sørensen T M, Jessen L R. Development of standard consensus definitions for infectious urinary tract disease in dogs and cats, a modified Delphi study.. The Journal of small animal practice. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.70127.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.