Factors affecting the outcome in patients with gastroschisis: how important is immediate repair?

BACKGROUND

Since 30 years, we have attempted to repair gastroschisis as early as possible, often even in the delivery room. We examined 12 recent years of patient records to evaluate the effect of immediate repair and other factors on the outcome of gastroschisis.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients presenting with gastroschisis (87) at the Children's Hospital of Michigan between 1998 and 2009. Data were evaluated specifically to determine the effect of the place of repair [obstetric hospital ("DR") vs. children's hospital ("OR")], the time of repair [less than an hour after delivery ("IR") or more than one hour ("ER")], and the type of repair [primary fascial repair and skin closure ("PR") vs. staged repair ("SR")].

RESULTS

Patients in the PR group were more likely to spend one week or less on MV (66% in PR vs. 11% in SR, p<0.01). Patients in the DR group were more likely to spend 2 weeks or less on TPN, as were patients in the PR group (51% in PR vs. 17% in SR, p<0.01). Patients in the PR group were more likely to stay in hospital for less than 3 weeks, but the IR and ER groups had almost same hospital stay. Major associated anomalies were present in 19 patients (29%). These patients and those with little or no peel tended to outperform those with peel in each of our outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Repair immediately after delivery is beneficial in terms of achieving primary closure of the defect, leading to shorter times on assisted ventilation and parenteral nutrition, and shorter hospital stays.