Triplets: outcomes of expectant management versus multifetal reduction for 127 pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare outcomes of women with triplet gestations conceived via assisted reproductive technology who chose expectant management or multifetal pregnancy reduction.

STUDY

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective review of all women who initiated assisted reproductive technology cycles from August 1995 through July 1997 with ultrasonographic documentation of triplets exhibiting fetal heart tones at 9 weeks of gestation (N = 127). Patients were then uniformly referred to a maternal-fetal medicine specialist and to 3 centers offering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

RESULTS

Thirty-six percent of patients (46/127) chose multifetal pregnancy reduction with 95% undergoing reduction to twins. In the expectant management group, 13.6% of pregnancies were reduced spontaneously after 9 weeks of gestation. The "take home" infant per delivery rates for the multifetal pregnancy reduction and expectant management groups were 87% and 90.1%, respectively (P =.66). The mean gestational ages at delivery (+/-SE) for the multifetal pregnancy reduction and expectant management groups were 33.25 +/- 1. 03 weeks and 32.04 +/- 0.58 weeks (P =.23), and the mean birth weights of infants delivered at >24 weeks of gestation were 2226 +/- 79 and 1796 +/- 44, respectively (P <.0001). There were no significant differences in perinatal mortality, gestational age at delivery, or "take home" infant per delivery rates between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that multifetal pregnancy reduction does not have a significant impact on the probability of live birth or on gestational age at delivery for women with triplets conceived with assisted reproductive technology.