MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00868-1

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 2000

Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery.

Robinson J N, Norwitz E R, Cohen A P, Lieberman E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with the use of episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery.

METHODS

We studied 1576 consecutive term, singleton, spontaneous vaginal deliveries in nulliparas at Brigham & Women's Hospital between December 1, 1994 and July 31, 1995. The association of demographic variables and obstetric factors with the rate of episiotomy use were examined. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall rate of episiotomy was 40.6% (640 of 1576). Midwives performed episiotomies at a lower rate (21.4%) than faculty (33.3%) and private providers (55.6%) (P =. 001). After controlling for confounding factors with logistic regression, private practice provider was the strongest predictor of episiotomy use (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.1, 5.4) followed by faculty provider (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.5), prolonged second stage of labor (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2, 2.7), fetal macrosomia (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.5), and epidural analgesia (OR 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1, 1.8).

CONCLUSION

The strongest factor associated with episiotomy at delivery was the category of obstetric provider. Obstetric and demographic factors evaluated did not readily explain this association.

Для цитирования: Robinson J N, Norwitz E R, Cohen A P, Lieberman E. Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00868-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.