DOI 10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.01.016
Prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants in fetuses with ventriculomegaly.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To systematically investigate chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants (CNVs) in fetuses with different types of ventriculomegaly (VM) by karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).
METHODS
This retrospective study included 312 fetuses diagnosed with VM. Amniotic fluid and umbilical blood samples were collected by amniocentesis and cordocentesis, respectively, and subjected to karyotyping and/or CMA. Subgroup analysis by VM type, including mild VM (MVM) and severe VM (SVM), unilateral and bilateral VM, isolated VM (IVM), and non-isolated VM (NIVM), was performed.
RESULTS
The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 12.1% (34/281) by karyotyping and 20.6% when CMA was additionally performed (P < 0.05). Abnormalities were identified by CMA in 17.4% (38/218) of fetuses and pathogenic CNVs in 5.0% (11/218). Notably, CMA detected CNVs in 10.6% (23/218) of fetuses with normal karyotypes. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities by karyotyping was higher in bilateral than in unilateral VM (20.5% versus 6.5%), whereas the incidence detected by CMA was higher in NIVM than in IVM (21.4% versus 10.3%; both P < 0.05). In NIVM, CMA provided an additional detection rate of 11.4% (16/140) and a detection rate of 10.0% for pathogenic CNVs and aneuploidies. Central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities were the most common other ultrasonic abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS
CMA is highly recommended for prenatal diagnosis of fetal VM together with karyotyping, especially in fetuses with bilateral VM and NIVM with abnormal CNS findings. Further study is necessary to explore the relationships between genotypes and phenotypes to facilitate prenatal diagnosis of fetal VM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.