MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2106/jbjs.e.00697

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2006

A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Smith Christopher D, Alexander Susan, Hill Adam M, Huijsmans Pol E, Bull Anthony M J, Amis Andrew A, De Beer Joe F, Wallace Andrew L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The optimal method for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is not yet known. The hypothesis of the present study was that a double-row repair would demonstrate superior static and cyclic mechanical behavior when compared with a single-row repair. The specific aims were to measure gap formation at the bone-tendon interface under static creep loading and the ultimate strength and mode of failure of both methods of repair under cyclic loading.

METHODS

A standardized tear of the supraspinatus tendon was created in sixteen fresh cadaveric shoulders. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed with use of either a double-row technique (eight specimens) or a single-row technique (eight specimens) with nonabsorbable sutures that were double-loaded on a titanium suture anchor. The repairs were loaded statically for one hour, and the gap formation was measured. Cyclic loading to failure was then performed.

RESULTS

Gap formation during static loading was significantly greater in the single-row group than in the double-row group (mean and standard deviation, 5.0 +/- 1.2 mm compared with 3.8 +/- 1.4 mm; p < 0.05). Under cyclic loading, the double-row repairs failed at a mean of 320 +/- 96.9 N whereas the single-row repairs failed at a mean of 224 +/- 147.9 N (p = 0.058). Three single-row repairs and three double-row repairs failed as a result of suture cut-through. Four single-row repairs and one double-row repair failed as a result of anchor or suture failure. The remaining five repairs did not fail, and a midsubstance tear of the tendon occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more technically demanding, the double-row technique demonstrates superior resistance to gap formation under static loading as compared with the single-row technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A double-row reconstruction of the supraspinatus tendon insertion may provide a more reliable construct than a single-row repair and could be used as an alternative to open reconstruction for the treatment of isolated tears.

Для цитирования: Smith Christopher D, Alexander Susan, Hill Adam M, Huijsmans Pol E, Bull Anthony M J, Amis Andrew A, De Beer Joe F, Wallace Andrew L. A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2006. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.e.00697.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.