MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.fas.2020.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2020

Management of posterior malleolus fractures: A multicentre cohort study in the United Kingdom.

Stringfellow T D, Walters S T, Nash W, Ahluwalia R, Posterior Malleolus Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is a need to assess clinical practice in light of increasing literature recommending fixation of posterior malleolus (PM) fractures. This multicentre study examines treatment approaches, within both Major Trauma Centres and District General Hospitals and role of radiographs and CT scanning.

METHODS

Trauma lists and databases were used to identify patients and data collected from electronic and paper medical records and imaging systems between August 2017-18. Analysis of treatment and outcomes was then conducted.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-sixty ankle fractures were included in the study, only 68 ankle fractures underwent CT scanning following initial radiographs and of these, 65 were managed operatively, with 32 undergoing PM fixation. Syndesmotic stabilisation was performed in 9.6% where the PM was fixed.

CONCLUSION

CT is still under-utilised, PM fractures that appear to be anything other than small avulsion-type injuries should undergo CT scanning. Syndesmotic stabilisation is statistically less likely to be performed with fixation of the PM.

Для цитирования: Stringfellow T D, Walters S T, Nash W, Ahluwalia R, Posterior Malleolus Study Group. Management of posterior malleolus fractures: A multicentre cohort study in the United Kingdom.. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.