DOI 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00300.x
Urological management of cloacal anomalies.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
A cloacal anomaly results from incomplete urorectal division and is frequently associated with genitourinary abnormalities. Experience of the urological reconstruction of this entity is reported.
METHODS
Nine girls with cloacal malformation have been treated at the Osaka Medical Center in the past 9 years. Seven patients were detected by prenatal ultrasonography as having: megacystis (two patients); hydronephrosis (two patients); or hydrometrocolpos (three patients). Two patients underwent prenatal shunt placement between the enlarged bladder and the amniotic space.
RESULTS
For neonatal urinary diversion, four patients received cystostomy. Six of seven patients with associated hydrocolpos required intermittent catheterization to decompress an enlarged vagina. Vesicoureteral reflux was detected in 12 ureters of seven patients. Antireflux surgery was indicated in four patients before definitive repair. Definitive reconstruction was performed on eight patients. The posterior sagittal approach was used in all patients. Vaginal reconstruction was done utilizing a perineal skin flap (one patient), a tubularized vaginal flap (three patients), distal rectum (three patients) and total urogenital mobilization (one patient). Postoperatively, urethrovaginal fistula was created in one patient and complete occlusion was seen in one patient.
CONCLUSION
The anatomical variety of this entity determines the management options from in utero. It involves not only the creation of three perineal orifices, but also a continent, catheterizable urethra under the stabilization of renal function. Accomplishment of the definitive repair requires the combined expertise of experienced pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.