[Impact of previous cesarean delivery on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed embryo transfer].

Objective

To investigate the impact of a previous cesarean delivery on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).

Methods

The clinical data of 1 179 patients who received in vitro fertilization and FET in Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics from January 2014 to May 2019 and had a history of the previous delivery were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into four groups according to different previous delivery history and the number of embryo transferred: group A (single embryo transfer group with cesarean delivery history, n=338), group B (single embryo transfer group with vaginal delivery history, n=78), group C (double embryo transfer group with cesarean delivery history, n=444), and group D (double embryo transfer group with vaginal delivery history, n=319). The 1∶1 propensity score based on age, body mass index (BMI), infertility duration, basal FSH, basal LH, number of oocytes retrieved and high-quality embryo rate was used to match group A and B (caliper value=0.15), group C and D (caliper value=0.05), and group A and C (caliper value=0.01) respectively to reduce the influence of selection bias. The clinical pregnancy outcomes of patients were compared.

Results

(1) Group A and group B were single embryo transfer groups with a total of 77 pairs of matched patients. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate [42.9% (33/77) vs 45.5% (35/77)], miscarriage rate, preterm birth rate, and neonatal birth weight (all P>0.05). (2) Group C and group D were double embryo transfer groups with a total of 304 pairs of matched patients. The clinical pregnancy rate [42.4% (129/304)] and twin pregnancy rate [9.5% (29/304)] of Group C were significantly lower than those of Group D [53.0% (161/304), 15.5% (47/304) respectively; both P<0.05). There were no statistically significant in miscarriage rate, preterm birth rate and neonatal birth weight between the two groups (all P>0.05). (3) Groups A and C matched 318 pairs of patients. The two groups had no statistical significances in clinical pregnancy rate [38.4% (122/318) vs 45.6% (145/318)], miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate (all P>0.05), but the twin pregnancy rate in group C was significantly higher than that of group A [11.3% (36/318) vs 0.3% (1/318), P<0.01). (4) The occurrence of the low-birth-weight infant were related to gestational age (OR=0.41, 95%CI: 0.32-0.54) and twin pregnancy (OR=4.44, 95%CI: 1.93-10.21), and the occurrence of macrosomia was related to BMI (OR=1.18, 95%CI: 1.06-1.32). Moreover, the previous delivery method was not related to the neonatal birth weight (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with different delivery histories receive FET therapy, the pregnancy outcomes of single embryo transfer are not significantly different, and the success rate of double embryo transfer in patients with a cesarean delivery history is low. The neonatal birth weight is not related to the history of the cesarean section. It is recommended that patients with a cesarean delivery history choose elective single embryo transfer to ensure the success rate and to reduce the risk.