Preoperative Pelvic Muscle Training for Continence Recovery After Prostatectomy: Yet Another Meta-Analysis?
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. Several meta-analyses have evaluated the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for continence recovery, but their findings are inconsistent, and not all include all relevant studies. This meta-analysis aims to address these gaps.
OBJECTIVES
The study aims to summarize evidence on the effectiveness of preoperative PFMT, with or without biofeedback, on continence recovery post-prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PICO framework was used: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, Intervention: preoperative PFMT, Comparison: any postoperative intervention or monitoring, Outcome: continence recovery. Studies were sourced from PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEdro. Quality was assessed using the PEdro scale, and statistical analysis was performed using a random effect model.
RESULTS
Six studies were included. Preoperative PFMT did not significantly improve continence recovery 1 month post-surgery (odds-ratio 2.01, 95% CI [0.94-4.31], p = 0.37). However, a significant improvement was observed 3 months post-surgery (odds-ratio 1.52, 95% CI [1.05-2.20], p = 0.03). No significant differences were found at 6 months (odds-ratio 1.28, 95% CI [0.85-1.94], p = 0.95) and twelve months (odds-ratio 0.73, 95% CI [0.43-1.23], p = 0.32).
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative PFMT may improve continence recovery 3 months post-surgery but not at one, six, or twelve months. The study highlights the need for standardized assessment criteria and further research on robotic-assisted prostatectomy. The innovative aspect of this study lies in its conservative inclusion criteria and focus on preoperative PFMT's potential benefits.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. This study did not require clinical trial registration because it is a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published studies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.