MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.010

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists · 2014

Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review.

Valdes Kristin, Naughton Nancy, Michlovitz Susan

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of a home program or a structured therapy program for patients following distal radius fracture.

METHODS

A search was performed using terms wrist fracture, supervised therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, splint, orthosis, distal radius fracture, exercise, and home program. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for research quality using The Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study (SEQES).

RESULTS

Five of the seven trials found no difference between outcomes for their subjects that had uncomplicated distal radius fractures. The population that has complications following distal radius fractures was not represented in the studies reviewed.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence from randomized controlled trials is insufficient to support a home program or therapist supervised clinic-based program as a superior method of treatment for adults following a distal radius fracture without complications or the presence of comorbidities.

Для цитирования: Valdes Kristin, Naughton Nancy, Michlovitz Susan. Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review.. Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.