MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ede.0000000000001697

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023

Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

Homayra Fahmida, Enns Benjamin, Min Jeong Eun, Kurz Megan, Bach Paxton, Bruneau Julie, Greenland Sander, Gustafson Paul, Karim Mohammad Ehsanul, Korthuis P Todd, Loughin Thomas, MacLure Malcolm, McCandless Lawrence, Platt Robert William, Schnepel Kevin, Shigeoka Hitoshi, Siebert Uwe, Socias Eugenia, Wood Evan, Nosyk Bohdan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Instrumental variable (IV) analysis provides an alternative set of identification assumptions in the presence of uncontrolled confounding when attempting to estimate causal effects. Our objective was to evaluate the suitability of measures of prescriber preference and calendar time as potential IVs to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS

Using linked population-level health administrative data, we constructed five IVs: prescribing preference at the individual, facility, and region levels (continuous and categorical variables), calendar time, and a binary prescriber's preference IV in analyzing the treatment assignment-treatment discontinuation association using both incident-user and prevalent-new-user designs. Using published guidelines, we assessed and compared each IV according to the four assumptions for IVs, employing both empirical assessment and content expertise. We evaluated the robustness of results using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The study sample included 35,904 incident users (43.3% on buprenorphine/naloxone) initiated on opioid agonist treatment by 1585 prescribers during the study period. While all candidate IVs were strong (A1) according to conventional criteria, by expert opinion, we found no evidence against assumptions of exclusion (A2), independence (A3), monotonicity (A4a), and homogeneity (A4b) for prescribing preference-based IV. Some criteria were violated for the calendar time-based IV. We determined that preference in provider-level prescribing, measured on a continuous scale, was the most suitable IV for comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone for the treatment of OUD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that prescriber's preference measures are suitable IVs in comparative effectiveness studies of treatment for OUD.

Для цитирования: Homayra Fahmida, Enns Benjamin, Min Jeong Eun, Kurz Megan, Bach Paxton, Bruneau Julie, Greenland Sander, Gustafson Paul, Karim Mohammad Ehsanul, Korthuis P Todd, Loughin Thomas, MacLure Malcolm, McCandless Lawrence, Platt Robert William, Schnepel Kevin, Shigeoka Hitoshi, Siebert Uwe, Socias Eugenia, Wood Evan, Nosyk Bohdan. Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2023. DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001697.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.