DOI 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.09.010
Postoperative Infection in the Setting of Massive Intraoperative Blood Loss.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the local rates of massive intraoperative blood loss and subsequent infectious morbidity for patients undergoing gynaecologic laparotomy.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing gynaecologic laparotomy between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 to identify cases of massive intraoperative blood loss (defined as ≥1 L estimated intraoperative blood loss, a postoperative reduction in hemoglobin concentration of ≥40 g/L, or a perioperative blood transfusion). For cases meeting these criteria, we abstracted further data to assess the rate of postoperative infectious morbidity (defined as a positive wound swab culture, positive urine culture, or satisfying the 1991 criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome).
RESULTS
The rate of massive intraoperative blood loss was 13.5% (n = 69). The average age in this cohort was 50.4 years (range 18-84 years) and the average BMI was 27.9 kg/m2. Perioperative transfusion was required in 31.9% (n = 22). Notably, 26.1% of patients (n = 18) met one of our primary endpoints for postoperative infectious morbidity. A further 10.1% (n = 7) had morbidities including hyponatremia, wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal abscess, positive blood cultures, acute respiratory distress syndrome, myocardial infarction, intensive care unit admission, or death.
CONCLUSION
Our rate of massive intraoperative blood loss during gynaecologic laparotomy was found to be 13.5%, and our rate of postoperative infectious morbidity subsequent to massive intraoperative blood loss was 26.1%.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.